-
October 23rd, 2005, 12:46 PM
#1
Inactive Member
Just still, to this day, wondering how they're considered 'glam' in the slightest. Thanks for your help with this dilemma.
-
October 23rd, 2005, 02:35 PM
#2
Inactive Member
Your question is a good one. Here's my theory on it...
The Fizzy Bangers were not glam AT ALL. That being said, the spirit of their music was fun, young, and silly, which all tend to be qualities of glam bands. On top of that, Chuck from Fizzy was/is a good friend of all the glam guys. When I was in LA in the early 90's, every party had the guys from BBB, QBP, HTM, etc., and the Fizzy guys, especially Chuck were always there...
I think people think of Fizzy as glam because a) they don't really fall into any traditional category, and b) they always hung around with glam bands...
Just my thoughts...
Sandi
-
October 23rd, 2005, 05:58 PM
#3
Inactive Member
very true, Fizzy's were Glam, more by Associaction, They always played glam shows, went to glam party's, Chuck was also known a the person to go about any Rumor or Gossip that existed in our lil' community (he knew everything), and another Glam fact when Faster Pussycat broke up, Brent Muscat joined the Fizzy Bangers. -I hope he is doing O.K.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks